We Boast in Our Struggles!

Posted on June 13, 2026 by Father Dave

“We boast in our afflictions, knowing that affliction produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and this hope does not disappoint us.” (Romans 5:3–5)

I suspect that this one‑liner from Saint Paul has been quoted by any number of motivational speakers, alongside other classics such as:

  • “Those things that do not kill us make us stronger” (Nietzsche)
  • “Where there is no struggle, there is no strength” (Oprah Winfrey)
  • “When the going gets tough, the tough get going” (1950s American football)

Would Saint Paul have succeeded on the motivational speaker circuit? I’m not sure. He has indeed inspired many of us, yet his message is a long way from anything we get from Oprah or Tony Robbins. Moreover, he didn’t present well.

“For some say, ‘His letters are weighty and forceful, but in person he is unimpressive and his speaking amounts to nothing.’” (2 Corinthians 10:10)

Those are Paul’s own words, reflecting on the feedback he received from the church in Corinth. People found him more impressive on paper than in person, and when you read the list of injuries he’d suffered by that stage, it’s little wonder:

“Five times I received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one. Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was pelted with stones, three times I was shipwrecked, I spent a night and a day in the open sea… etc.” (2 Corinthians 11:24–25)

Even if we only consider the first item on that list — receiving the “forty lashes minus one” five times — that’s incredible. As I understand it, the reason the Romans limited their lashing to 40 minus one was because 40 lashes was enough to kill you. So 39 was something you were expected to survive… but only just. Paul experienced this five times, along with multiple other beatings, stonings, drownings, and more!

It is a miracle that Paul survived as long as he did, but he must have been deeply disfigured. After thirty years of apostolic ministry, I imagine Paul looking like one of those prize fighters who never knew when to quit. He’d turn up at your church on a Sunday to preach, and the kids would recoil when they saw him. And no, he wasn’t a great speaker, but how eloquent can you be when your jaw has been shattered multiple times and you have no teeth?

Paul’s opponents clearly got a lot of mileage out of this. The “super apostles”, as he sarcastically calls them (2 Corinthians 11:5; 12:11), probably did look and sound a lot more like Tony Robbins and Oprah – sophisticated, well-spoken, nicely dressed, and doing well, which is what we’d expect, for doesn’t the Good Book say, “Prosperity pursues the righteous”? (Proverbs 13:21)

Indeed, the Torah repeatedly tells us that godly, clean living leads to a quiet, happy, and prosperous life. Paul’s life as an apostle had never been quiet, and he certainly wasn’t prosperous. As to being happy, Paul claimed to be full of joy, but how joyful can you be when you’re constantly being stoned, flogged, drowned and beaten?

Paul wasn’t just controversial. He was notorious. Many of his beatings were official punishments. Others were mob violence. A lot of influential, sophisticated people really hated him. Looking back, it’s remarkable that the early church stuck with Paul when his opponents were better spoken, better looking, and were preaching a far more palatable message.

Can we imagine a debate between Tony Robbins — slick, sophisticated, the kind of man we all admire — and the Hunchback of Notre Dame, a spluttering wreck of a man, telling us that we have to share in Christ’s suffering if we want to share in His glory (Romans 8:17)?

“We boast in our afflictions, knowing that affliction produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope…” (Romans 5:3–5)

I think the key to grasping Paul’s message here is recognising that he’s not giving a motivational talk. He’s not offering us the keys to success. He’s not our business coach, helping us to get ahead. No. First and foremost, Paul is trying to come to terms with his own wounds and failures in the light of the sufferings of Christ.

Christ is the visible image of our invisible God, Paul believed (Colossians 1:15), yet Christ suffered. This means that suffering is not necessarily a sign of God’s displeasure. Indeed, for us it may signify alignment with the life of Christ. This changes everything, and it invites us to reassess our own history of pain.

I think of all the things that have gone wrong for me over the years – broken relationships, lost opportunities, financial hardships, and betrayals. Are these signs of my own human frailty, or could they be indicators that I’m sharing in the life of Christ?

I’ve been grieving having been deplatformed by YouTube recently. “Where did I go wrong?” Is that even the right question? Would a better question be, “How long would Saint Paul’s YouTube account have lasted?” “Would Jesus have been deplatformed?” Did I do something wrong, or am I sharing in the life of Christ?

I’m not suggesting that there’s a single, simple answer to every question like this — not in my life, nor in yours. Even so, what I see Paul doing is taking control of his own life narrative by taking himself off centre stage, and instead of seeing himself as the star of his own life story and trying to make sense of his relationship with God from that perspective, he sees himself as a supporting actor in Christ’s story.

Once he does that, his pain and sins and failures take on new meaning! They become a participation in the life of Christ, and weakness becomes not a failure but a portal through which Christ can mould our character and teach us endurance.

The world still admires the polished, the prosperous, and the well‑presented, but where God connects with us, now as then, is in our brokenness. Suffering is never the end of the story but the place where Christ meets us. So we do not lose heart. Rather, we boast in our sufferings because we recognise that this is how Christ is shaping us, strengthening us, and preparing us for glory.

If we suffer with Him, we will rise with Him. And that hope will not disappoint us!

Romans 5First published on Father Dave’s weekly newsletter – June 12th, 2026

Posted in Sermons: Epistles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mercy Knows No Limits!

Posted on June 6, 2026 by Father Dave

And as He sat at dinner in the house, many tax collectors and sinners came and were sitting with Jesus and His disciples. When the Pharisees saw this, they said to His disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” (Matthew 9:10-11)

I’m with the Pharisees on this one!

I know many of us were brought up believing that Nazis, Communists and Pharisees are always the bad guys. Even so, I look at this scene where Jesus is having a party with a group of ‘tax collectors and sinners’, and I find myself asking the exact same question the Pharisees were asking: “Why does Jesus eat with these people?”

This party scene follows immediately on the story of the calling of Matthew, who was himself a tax collector, and so the party is taking place in Matthew’s house with Matthew’s friends, and it makes complete sense to me that the local spiritual leaders found this offensive, as tax collectors were despicable people!

If we were living in Gaza now, watching our country being systematically destroyed – our homes demolished, members of our family being killed, and with us facing the real and imminent threat of starvation – who would we be most angry with?

We would hate the enemy, of course – those with guns and bombs doing all the damage. Even more than them, though, we would despise the collaborators – members of our own community who had turned against us and who were on the payroll of the enemy.

No, the Romans were not carrying out a genocide in Judea at the time of Jesus. Even so, theirs was a violent and ruthless occupation, and when the Jewish people did eventually have their own October 7 moment – rising up against their occupiers and attempting to throw off the Roman yoke in the year 70 AD – the imperial response was brutal and merciless!

First-century Jewish people hated the Romans with a passion, of course, but the one group they hated more was the collaborators: people like Matthew, the tax collector.

When the Romans conquered a new town, they would auction off the job of chief tax collector for that area. Zaccheus, whom we meet in Luke, chapter 19, was the chief tax collector for the city of Jericho. The role would have cost him a lot of money. Why would anyone pay a large sum for the right to collect taxes for Rome? Because it could make you an even larger sum! It was a way to get very wealthy, very quickly.

Chief tax collectors then subcontracted their work to smaller tax agents who sat at toll booths on the roads and city gates. Matthew was one of these smaller toll collectors. He was expected to charge people 2% to 5% of the goods they brought into the city, on top of which he added his own commission – an amount that was whatever he said it was, and if you didn’t like his calculations, he had the Roman army to back him up!

Tax collectors were crooks, and they were collaborators, and they were very wealthy. There were lots of reasons to avoid them, and zero good reasons for pious and patriotic people to party with them, so … “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?

Some will say at this point, ‘Well, we are all sinners, so this is us’, but it’s not us. The crowd Jesus is partying with here are people we don’t want to party with.

Of course, we don’t know exactly who was there. When Jesus dines with Zacchaeus, he is like a Mafiosi boss, and we might expect other leading gangsters and, of course, their lawyers. Matthew isn’t at that level, so it’s probably mainly drug dealers and sex workers (or their equivalent). Were there known paedophiles hanging out at Matthew’s house that night?

I saw an alleged Truth Social post from Donald Trump, saying, “Nobody knows God better than me.” I believe it’s a fake post, but the genuine quotes aren’t much better:

  • “I have a great relationship with God.” — CNN interview, 2016
  • The Bible is my favorite book. Nothing beats the Bible.” — Campaign video, 2015

If Jesus were to somehow reappear in the flesh, and if I saw him make a beeline for Donald Trump, lunching with him and his friends, I would have an issue with that.

If Jesus were to come back and, instead of lunching with me and my mates, He chose to attend social events put on by those supporting the war against Iran or with those opposing all forms of immigration, or if He turned up at a social gathering of the Ku Klux Klan, I would have an issue with that!

Yes, Jesus explains why He does what He does: “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick.” (Matthew 9:12) Even so, how sick do sick people have to be before the godliest thing we can do is to avoid these people?  Isn’t partying with people like this giving them the wrong message? Isn’t there a point where, if we’re going to maintain some level of moral decency, we simply need to stay away from people like this?

If we look at our larger Gospel reading from Matthew, chapter 9, it covers a series of encounters. There’s this meeting with Matthew, the tax collector, and his friends. Then there’s Jesus’ encounter with the woman who is haemorrhaging (Matthew 9:20-22), and finally, we see Jesus resurrect a young girl who has died! The common denominator in each of these encounters is that all these people are considered ‘unclean’.

The haemorrhaging woman is unclean because she is haemorrhaging. The dead girl is unclean because she is dead. Matthew and his friends are unclean because they are dirtbags, and because they worked for the Romans, mixed with gentiles, etc.

Jesus crosses the boundary between clean and unclean in a way that I find unnerving. If He had restricted Himself to preaching to the unclean, I wouldn’t have a problem, but Jesus touches the unclean. sits with the unclean. raises the unclean, and He parties with the unclean!

I remember once watching a news report on the trial of a notorious paedophile, and I remember the cameras catching the image of a Salvation Army officer who was acting as a support person for the accused. I remember thinking then, ‘Is this really what the Gospel requires – that we reach out in compassion to people like that?’

“Go and learn what this means,” says Jesus, “’I desire mercy, not sacrifice. ‘ For I have not come to call the righteous but sinners. (Matthew 9:13)

First published in Father Dave’s newsletter, June 5th, 2026

Matthew 9:13

Posted in Sermons: Gospels | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A God Who Refuses to Stay Far Away

Posted on May 31, 2026 by Father Dave

“The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, the whole thing incomprehensible.”

Yes, it’s Trinity Sunday again — the only Sunday in the Christian year dedicated not to a story, not to a feast, not to a person, but to a doctrine. And the quote I just gave you is not, of course, a part of the doctrine itself. It’s Dorothy Sayers’ satirical summary of the doctrine as presented in the Athanasian Creed.

The creed itself is far more solemn — and far longer:

“Such as the Father is, such is the Son: and such is the Holy Ghost.
The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate: and the Holy Ghost uncreate.
The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible: and the Holy Ghost incomprehensible…”

And so it goes on — and on — and on. What I just read is only a small sample. The full creed is more than ten times that length!

Earlier this year at Concord Uniting Church, we recited almost the entire thing on Good Friday. I’m fairly sure most people had never heard of it before, let alone recited it aloud. And the real question, of course, was: did any of us understand it?

Years ago my friend Sheikh Mansour told me that a Christian friend of his in Iran once begged him to explain the Trinity. Mansour said, “It doesn’t make any more sense to me than it does to you”, and then he asked me the question many have asked: Why do we stick with this craziness?

Now, I’m actually a big fan of the doctrine of the Trinity — not because it is simple, but because I see it as the Church’s honest attempt to speak about God as based on our Scriptures. For years, though, I did see the whole debate as largely academic — the domain of philosophers and theologians — but this year something struck me afresh: Athanasius — the man most responsible for formulating the doctrine — was not just an armchair academic. He was a legend!

I’ve been reading Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which includes a surprisingly detailed biography of Athanasius. I confess: I had no idea. I had pictured Athanasius as a brilliant but bookish old professor — the sort who can explain metaphysics but can’t change a tyre. I couldn’t have been more wrong!

Athanasius was a thinker, yes — but he was also a doer. He was a pastor, a preacher, and a strategist. He could hold his own in the council chamber as well as in the desert. At the Council of Nicaea in 325, he helped hammer out the Church’s confession of the faith. After Nicaea he became the bishop of Alexandria — and a great warrior for truth.

You might have thought that winning the debate at Nicaea, with the emperor’s backing, would have secured him a peaceful and prosperous future. In truth, though, it was after they made him bishop that his troubles really began!

Athanasius had enemies — men he had done battle with in the Trinitarian controversy who didn’t disappear when the council ended. They regrouped. They whispered in the emperor’s ear, and ten years after Nicaea, in 335, Athanasius was deposed by the Council of Tyre and exiled by Constantine — the very emperor who had been his biggest fan!

Two years after that, though, Constantine died, and his sons reversed the decision. Athanasius returned in triumph to Alexandria, but within another two years an enemy bishop was installed in his place, and he had to flee again, this time to Rome!

Athanasius spent ten years in Rome, ministering to the people and winning their love, but in 356, Emperor Constantius II ordered his arrest. Athanasius escaped by night and hid among the monks of the Egyptian desert.

In total, Athanasius was exiled five times, and the charges against him were wild: murder, sorcery, treason, and — wait for it — tax evasion!

The most colourful accusation was his alleged murder of Bishop Arsenius. His enemies claimed that Athanasius had killed Arsenius and cut off his hand for use in magic rituals. The prosecution’s case collapsed spectacularly, though, when Athanasius produced Arsenius alive at the trial — with both hands intact!

“Athanasius contra mundum”, they said of him — ‘Athanasius against the world’.

Interestingly, he was never charged with heresy. No one dared take him on where it mattered. They couldn’t defeat him on the Scriptures, so they attacked his character. They couldn’t silence his theology, so they tried to destroy his reputation.

This all sounds very familiar. As many of you know, Google recently accused me of supporting terrorism and permanently deleted my YouTube account. What was the real issue? Well … I’m pretty sure it had nothing to do with me supporting terrorism.

For Athanasius, the real issue was never academic. The doctrine of the Trinity may be complex in its formulation and incomprehensible in its fullness, but for Athanasius it expressed a simple, central truth that he refused to surrender:

We will never get more of God than what we get in Jesus Christ. And when God gives us the Spirit, God gives us God’s self — not simply some spiritual assistant.

This, Athanasius believed, is as faithful to the Scriptures as it is to our experience. It is God who comes to us in Jesus. He is, as Saint Paul says, “the visible image of the invisible God.” (Colossians 1:15)

Athanasius didn’t cling to a doctrine. He clung to God, and the God he clung to was the God he met in Jesus — the God who comes close, who takes flesh, who breathes His Spirit into us.

That is the Trinity: God above us, God with us, God within us – not three gods, not a maths problem, but one God who refuses to stay distant.

And that is something worth standing for, even if the whole world stands against you.

First published in Father Dave’s weekly newsletter – May 29, 2026

Colossians 1:15

Posted in Topical Sermons | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

We Are One in the Spirit!

Posted on May 25, 2026 by Father Dave


Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.” (Genesis 11:4)

It’s Pentecost Sunday this week – the birthday of the church – and it’s hard to know where to begin. Do we start with the tongues of fire, with the rushing wind, or with the disciples’ speaking in languages they’d never learned? I want to begin at the very beginning – inGenesis – wheree we first see people divided into different tribes and language groups and where we first see the Spirit of God on the move.

The quote I’ve given you is from Genesis 11, verse 4: “They said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.””

This is the Tower of Babel story, and it’s the last story in the ‘ancient history’ section of the Hebrew Bible that takes us from the creation of the world (in Genesis 1) up to the birth of Abraham, who appears in Genesis 12, after which the Hebrew Bible follows the lives of Abraham and his descendants – the ‘people of Israel’. Abram, though, makes his appearance in Genesis 12 as the solution to the chaos that the world has fallen into by that stage – a chaos culminating in this story of the tower.

It was the original MBGA movement – ‘Make Babel Great Again’ – and perhaps it would have failed anyway due to the poor acronym, but God knew that it was not going to end well, so God ‘confused their language’ (Genesis 11:6) so that they could no longer understand each other and no longer work together. Instead, they divided into tribes, and soon enough the tribes were at war with one another … and we’re still at war with one another!

I remember when I started as a parish priest in Dulwich Hill in 1990. What was the biggest problem in the community? Ask anyone. It was the Vietnamese!

It was the Vietnamese who were bringing drugs into the area. It was a Vietnamese boy who had been arrested at the school for threatening someone with a machete! He claimed he didn’t know you weren’t allowed to bring a machete to school!

Ten years later we all seemed to be enjoying Vietnamese food, and the Vietnamese didn’t seem to be the problem anymore. It was the Lebanese!

The Lebanese boys had their own gang – ‘the Legends’ – and they didn’t just have knives. They had guns (or so we were told)! They definitely had baseball bats. I remember conferencing with the police about that. Those were the days before mobile phones, yet they all managed to mobilise with their bats very rapidly.

I was in Dulwich Hill for thirty years, and I worked a lot with those Lebanese boys along with my friend, Sheikh Mansour, and by the time I left, the Lebanese weren’t such a big issue. We were more worried about the Tongan boys, who seemed to form something of an alliance with some of the Indigenous kids.

I’ll never forget one particularly notorious girl who sold drugs, would beat up on some of the other kids, and who stole our youth worker’s motorcycle. I remember when the police arrested her once at our youth centre. She raised her fist as she was led away, crying “Stay Black!” (which we felt really missed the point).

Tribalism – it’s as old as Babel, and it makes for easily digestible political fodder.
Pauline Hanson suggests that there are no ‘good Muslims’ and that most of this country’s problems are due to our out-of-control immigration.

Nigel Farage, whom many think could be the next Prime Minister of Britain, speaks of immigration as an ‘invasion’ and says, “You might as well put a sign on the white cliffs of Dover saying, “Everyone welcome.'”‘

And the real irony of this sort of anti-immigration rhetoric is often sold to us as some sort of Christian mission, as if fear of the outsider were a Christian virtue. Viktor Orbán, the Prime Minister of Hungary, speaks of his policies as his attempt to defend “Christian Europe” against the corrupting forces of multiculturalism!

Now, I don’t want to deny that there are real and significant cultural differences between the different tribes spread across our planet, but God has given us the antidote to Babel, and that antidote is the Spirit of God!

“They were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance.” (Acts 2:4)

Pentecost is the reversal of the curse of Babel.

  • At Babel people came together to make a name for themselves and to be great. At Pentecost God brings us together to create something new.
  • At Babel, language becomes a barrier. At Pentecost, it becomes a bridge.
  • At Babel, confusion leads to division. At Pentecost, confusion leads to the creation of a new community, a new humanity, and a new way of belonging.

This is the birth of the church. This is who we are. We are the multicultural, multilingual, multi-tribal community brought together by the Spirit of God to show the rest of the world that true human community really is possible.

I’ve spent much of my life moving between cultures. When I was a boy, most of my friends were Greek. Then I married into a Chinese family and spent quite a bit of time in Southeast Asia. Over the last twenty years I’ve immersed myself in the Arabic and Persian communities, and I think I’ve learnt what it is that brings us together, and it’s not the boxing (as powerful a tool as that can be). It’s the Spirit of God.

It’s the Spirit of God who breaks down the walls we build. It’s the Spirit of God who speaks every language. It’s the Spirit that gathers what Babel scatters and the Spirit who makes us one — young and old, rich and poor, Jew and Greek, Tongan and Lebanese, black and white.

In the Spirit of God, we are connected. In the Spirit of God, we are one.

Amen.

Acts 2:4

First published on Father Dave’s blog – May 22nd, 2026

Posted in Sermons: Epistles | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Christ’s Victory Speaks Into Our Suffering (1 Peter 3:13-22)

Posted on May 9, 2026 by Father Dave

“For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, in order to bring you to God.”

It’s from the first letter of Peter (chapter 3, verse 18), but you’d be forgiven for assuming this was Saint Paul or one of the other New Testament authors, as it’s solid, stock-standard biblical teaching, isn’t it? Even so, the verses that follow this are probably the most obscure and difficult sentences in the Christian Scriptures!

I’ll read those verses in a moment, but first a question: ‘Did anyone else receive a text message last Monday featuring an image of someone wielding a lightsabre?’

Joy and I sent complimentary BitMojis to each other last Monday morning, with each of us holding lightsabres of different colours. Last Monday was, of course, Star Wars Day – May 4th (‘May the Fourth be with you’).

I know not everyone loves Star Wars as we do, but it is, unquestionably, one of the defining narratives of our generation, and if you don’t know how the story was written, George Lucas deliberately built it around “The Hero’s Journey” as outlined in Professor Joseph Campbell’s book, “The Hero with a Thousand Faces”.

Campbell believed that all great tales and communal narratives, including the Bible, follow the same basic plotline, and Lucas constructed the Star Wars narrative to fit that storyline, which is why Professor Campbell was invited to Skywalker Ranch to preview the movie before it was released to the public.

Now, don’t fear! I’m not going to construct a sermon on how it was Jesus who really destroyed the Death Stars and brought down The Empire, but this is pretty much what Peter was doing in chapter three of his first letter. Let me continue with it:

“For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, in order to bring you to God. He was put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, in which also he went and made a proclamation to the spirits in prison, who in former times did not obey when God waited patiently in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight lives, were saved through water.”  (1 Peter 3:18-20)

Biblical scholars do see these words from Peter as amongst the most difficult and obscure passages in the entire New Testament.

  • Who are these spirits?
  • What is this prison?
  • What exactly did Jesus proclaim?

Some have seen this as a reference to ‘purgatory’ – the place where souls go after death if they’re not good enough for heaven but not bad enough for hell – but there’s nowhere else in the Scriptures that gives the slightest hint that such a place exists!

2nd-century theologian Clement of Alexandria suggested thatj when, after the crucifixion, Christ descended into hell (as is affirmed in our creeds), he preached to the tortured souls from Noah’s day, but the Bible never describes hell as a prison, and why would Jesus be singling out Noah’s contemporaries for a second chance?

Saint Augustine suggested that Christ, in His pre-existent Divine nature, preached through Noah to the people of his day who were ‘imprisoned in sin and ignorance’.

This interpretation seems the most unlikely of all, as Peter says Jesus was first “put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit” (1 Peter 3:18), so whatever was happening happened after the resurrection, not thousands of years earlier.

No. What seems to be happening here is that Saint Peter is drawing on a well-known story that was a defining narrative for the people of his generation, just as the Star Wars story is a defining narrative for many in ours.

Peter was drawing on a story from the first book of Enoch (chapters 6 to 21) where a group of 200 angels, called ‘the Watchers’, rebelled against God, descended to earth, took human wives, and taught forbidden knowledge – sorcery and astrology.

The story is inspired by Genesis 6:1–4, which mentions some “sons of God”  taking human wives who produce giant offspring. This lead to the world becoming so full of violence that the flood becames necessary in order to give humanity a fresh start!

In Enoch’s narrative, God sends archangels Michael, Gabriel, Raphael and Uriel to imprison the Watchers until the final judgement, which is where they are when, according to Peter, they hear Christ’s proclamation of victory.

As I say, the Enoch story was something of a defining narrative for Peter’s people . This should not surprise us. They were living at a time when their community was being abused, and the first book of Enoch was a story of survival and triumph.

Peter’s church included men, women, and slaves. Slaves were being abused because they were slaves. Women were abused because they were women. Others were being abused simply because they were Christians. Abuse seemed built into the system, and many believed therefore that the system had to be destroyed by revolution. Peter, though, saw another way — the way of Christ, who defeated violence not by hitting back but by enduring it.

Through His death and resurrection, Peter says, Christ beat the system, and whatever form evil takes in our world – whether it comes from religious zealots or from the empire or from strange spiritual forces in the heavenly realms – all these powers have been disarmed and defeated by Christ through His resurrection!

Did Peter literally believe the stories of Enoch, or did he see them the way we might see Star Wars — as powerful narratives that convey deep truth even if the events they portray didn’t literally happen? I don’t think it matters. What Peter understood is that every evil in our world – real and imagined – is powerless against Christ! On account of His death and resurrection, the writing is already on the wall. Evil is on its way out, and liberation is near!

And this is where Peter’s message becomes our message.

I look around our world and I see so much evil. There is so much greed and violence in our world at the moment that we seem to be just about ready to self-destruct! Even so, what can we do? The power of the ‘dark side’ seems so overwhelming!

Peter tells us to look up! Christ has already proclaimed His victory to those spirits in prison. He has already spoken His word of triumph into the depths!

For there is no darkness that he has not entered, no enemy that He has not faced and no fear that He has not already confronted!

So let us stand firm, lift up our heads and walk in hope, for the Christ who descended to the depths now walks beside us, and His victory speaks into our suffering even now.

First published in Father Dave’s weekly newsletter – May 9th, 2026

1 Peter 3:18-19

Posted in Sermons: Epistles | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Your Place is Prepared! (John 14:1-3)

Posted on May 2, 2026 by Father Dave

“Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many rooms. If it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and take you to myself, that where I am, you may be also.” (John 14:1-3)

I know these words off by heart, and that’s because I’ve said them at every funeral I’ve ever taken (and I’ve taken a lot of funerals). They appear in every Anglican funeral liturgy, and I suspect they appear similarly in funeral rites across different Christian traditions, because they offer us a beautiful image of a hereafter where there is room for us all.

Many of us grew up with the King James Version: “In my Father’s house there are many mansions,” and that sounds even better! I love the idea of everyone getting their own mansion, and, let’s be honest, that would solve a lot of problems. I remember, at Uncle Jack’s funeral, thinking that adjoining mansions would be just fine for him and Aunty Ethel, so long as there was a bit of space between them.

If Jesus were creating a sales presentation for the afterlife, “In my Father’s house there are many mansions” would likely be in bold lettering across the front page of the brochure. Even so, and I hate to say it, I don’t think these verses really have anything to do with the afterlife. I hate to say it because I don’t want to trample on anyone’s cherished image of their loved ones enjoying their heavenly real estate, but the word “mansion” didn’t mean luxury when the King James Bible was published. It just meant “dwelling place” or “stopping place”, and the word in the original Greek text – ‘monai’ – similarly, simply means a place where you live or even just hang out.

More significantly, in terms of our understanding this passage, Jesus wasn’t saying these things to His disciples because they were about to die. It was Jesus who was about to die! When Jesus said he was “going” somewhere, He wasn’t referring to heaven — he was going to the cross. Yes, he says, “I will come again and take you to myself”, and He does come back after the resurrection, and then He comes to them again through the Spirit, but He doesn’t come back to take them to heaven. He comes back to them to be with them so that together they can continue in the work He has given them to do.

I’m tempted to offer a modern translation here: “In my Father’s office there are many workstations, and I go to prepare a cubicle for you.” That’s accurate, I think, except that I can’t bring myself to think of Jesus as an office manager. I have no problem with Jesus as a shepherd, a priest, or as my king, but not in a role where He has to wear a suit and tie. Moreover, the imagery here is not of Jesus assigning us jobs in the family business but of something more radical: the Father handing over the business to us. Jesus says, “The works that I do, you will do – and greater works.”

So these verses are not marketing for a heavenly retirement package, and yet they’re not all about finding your cubicle in the heavenly office block either. If we look at the broader discourse, we see that they are really all about Jesus’ promise that He is never going to leave us alone.

“Do not let your hearts be troubled.” That’s how our passage begins, and these words of reassurance are tied to the promise Jesus gives us in verse 18: “I will not leave you desolate.” That is the heartbeat of the passage. Jesus promises that he will never abandon his people – a promise that would have struck the disciples with enormous force because he was also telling them that he was about to disappear.

“You know the way to the place where I am going,” He says. “Lord, we do not know where you are going,” they reply. They are confused. They fear abandonment. Jesus is preparing them for the shock that is about to unfold. He will go, but He will return!

I’m really struck here by how much this resembles our own experience. Life with Jesus is a roller coaster. Jesus comes. Jesus goes. Jesus returns in the resurrection, and then He goes again. Then he returns again through the Spirit, though it often feels like he’s gone again.

The disciples are confused before he leaves. They despair when he’s gone, and they are scared when he returns. And just as they begin to adjust to having him back, he disappears again. This resonates with me too!

I remember a song I learnt in Sunday School:

“He lives, He lives, Christ Jesus lives today.
He walks with me, He talks with me along life’s narrow way.”

What the song leaves out is how Jesus, ‘who walks with me and talks with me along life’s narrow way’ also regularly disappears on me mid‑walk!

Without doubt Jesus has His reasons, but the disciples struggled to make sense of why Jesus had to go to the cross even if it was somehow for their benefit. Jesus, likewise, told them it was good that he went away again after the resurrection because the Spirit would not come until he did—though it wasn’t obvious to them then, and it isn’t obvious to us now why it had to happen in exactly that way.

Life with Jesus is confusing and unpredictable. We don’t always understand why He is doing what He is doing, and we rarely know what’s coming next, but we have this central promise: “Let not your hearts be troubled… I will not leave you desolate.”

So forget the heavenly real estate brochures. Forget the mansions and the marble staircases. Jesus offers us something more valuable than a retirement village in the clouds. He offers us himself — His presence, His power, His Spirit, and His mission.

He goes to the cross. He rises from the grave. He breathes the Spirit and then hands us the keys to the family business, saying, “Greater works than these, please.”

So lift up your hearts and lift up your eyes. The One who goes before us also walks beside us. Jesus, who prepares a place for us, has also prepared us for that place. And the One who calls us into that place has promised that He will meet us there!

“I will come again and take you to myself, that where I am, you may be also.” (John 14:3)

John 14:3First published in Father Dave’s weekly newsletter – May 1st, 2026

Posted in Sermons: Gospels | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Joy of Suffering Unjustly!

Posted on April 25, 2026 by Father Dave

“For it is a commendable thing if, being aware of God, a person endures pain while suffering unjustly. If you endure when you are beaten for doing wrong, what credit is that? But if you endure when you do good and suffer for it, this is a commendable thing before God. For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his footsteps.” (1 Peter 2:19-21)

This has to be the craziest command in the entire New Testament. Getting beaten up for no reason and doing nothing in return! Since when was that a good idea?!

As well as being a professional boxer, I have six black belts in the martial arts, and I’ve spent a lot of time teaching self-defence. I’ve taught self-defence to women. I taught it to our local police. I even taught it to a church security team! What I’ve never taught is the technique here advocated here by the Apostle Peter – namely, just enduring the beating and doing nothing in response!

When we put these verses in their context, things only look worse. Peter is talking here to slaves – people whom he surely believed were their masters’ equals! And from there Peter goes on to tell wives to submit to their husbands (1 Peter 3:1), which sounds like another invitation to a beating. Further, he tells all of us to submit to the government! (1 Peter 2:13), and this at a time when Christians were being fed to lions! Is this really what being a part of Christ’s flock is about?

Some Christian thinkers have been bold enough to accept that this is pretty much what Peter taught. John Howard Yoder, in his famous book, “The Politics of Jesus”, grounded his pacifism in passages like this. Indeed, Yoder pointed out that 1 Peter 2:21 is the only place in the entire New Testament where the lifestyle of Jesus is used as an example for us to follow. Jesus slept outdoors a lot, but we’re never told that; therefore, we should try sleeping outdoors. Jesus never married, but this is never given as a reason for us not to marry. The only point at which the lifestyle of Jesus is used as an example for us is here, says Yoder – in Jesus’ refusal to respond to violence with violence! He left you this example “so that you should follow in his footsteps.” (1 Peter 2:21)

Incidentally, in year 2000, Christianity Today ranked “The Politics of Jesus” as number five on its list of the most important religious books of the 20th century, so clearly, Yoder and Saint Peter have inspired many Christians to non-violence. The obvious question then is, ‘How the hell do I, as a Christian priest, get away with teaching people to fight?’

I’ve been asked that question a lot over the years, of course, not only by those who don’t approve of boxing but also by those who consider the martial arts to be nefarious portals to Eastern mysticism and idolatry. There’s not a simple one-size-fits-all answer to all the issues here, but let me share with you a few thoughts.

Firstly, I don’t consider boxing to be a form of violence – certainly not the way I do it or teach it. For me, it’s a form of rough play.

Years ago I used to teach wrestling to young people in Sydney’s juvenile detention centre (prison for those under 18 years of age), and I was astonished as to how often, after I’d finished a session of rumbling with those guys (almost all of whom were bigger and stronger than me), they’d tell me how our session reminded them of days when they’d rumble in the backyard with their dads when they were kids.

Rough play doesn’t have to be destructive, and from my experience, amateur boxing rarely does anyone any harm but can do a lot of people a lot of good – particularly, in my experience, ‘at-risk’ young people. Professional boxing has money involved, of course, so that’s riskier, but I have always felt protected by the rules and the referees, and I believe they’ve protected my opponents as well. Mind you, this is also why I got out of kickboxing and mixed martial arts when the rules of competition changed. I believed people were going to get seriously damaged, so I got out, but that’s another story.

In terms of the teachings of the Apostle Peter and his exhortation not to hit back, it’s important, I think, to distinguish between violence and vengeance. Vengeance is hitting someone because they hit you. They slap you on the cheek, so you slap them back. They swear at you; you swear back. They pick up a gun. You grab yours!

Vengeance is what we call ‘retributive’ justice. It’s about giving as good as you get, and our Scriptures are entirely consistent in saying that there’s no place for this. ‘Vengeance is mine, says the Lord’ (Deuteronomy 32:35, Romans 12:19, Hebrews 10:30). We are never permitted to hit someone simply because they hit us. If we are to be true to Jesus and the Scriptures, we cannot do this on any level. That, in itself, though, does not mean that there’s never a time to fight.

Saint Augustine developed the ‘just war’ theory, suggesting that, while living peaceably with one another is always the goal, there may be times when even wars must be waged by those who follow Christ, but never for vengeance, and there are very strict conditions, such as:

  1. Wars could only be ordered for the sake of peace.
  2. War had to be motivated by love of neighbour.
  3. Wars must not harm the innocent.

Augustine’s theory was further developed and codified by Saint Thomas Aquinas, and, quite honestly, I suspect Saint Peter may well have agreed with Augustine and Aquinas – that there could be times when applying maximum force to someone or even to some nation was not only appropriate but the only loving thing to do. It’s just ironic that in the current conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States, it’s not the supposedly Christian country that is following these teachings of the church fathers here!

There’s a lot more that could be said but, in closing, I note that, from what we know, Saint Peter himself died a violent death at the hands of government authorities. It is said that they crucified him upside-down! Whatever the grim details, his violent end suggests that Peter did not quietly live out his life in humble submission to the governing authorities. He stood up and he spoke out! Even so, like his master, he did not hit back:

“When he was abused, he did not return abuse; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but he entrusted himself to the one who judges justly.” (1 Peter 2:23)

1 Peter 2:21
First published in Father Dave’s weekly newsletter – April 24th, 2026

Posted in Sermons: Epistles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Donald Trump the Beast of Revelation 13?

Posted on April 14, 2026 by Father Dave

Trump as Jesus!Whenever any earthly power starts to look like a saviour, the church must remember that there is only one who is worthy of worship.

I’ve never felt comfortable with those who read the political landscape through the lens of the books of Daniel and Revelation, constantly finding new figures to identify as ‘the beast’ and new formulas for generating the number 666. Having said that, Mr. Trump’s most recent self-portrait as Jesus, generating divine healing power while he simultaneously murders countless people in Iran and Lebanon and appears to be intent on engineering a global economic collapse, has prompted me to reconsider the prophecies regarding the Antichrist.

It’s tempting to look to The Revelation of Saint John and other apocalyptic works for straightforward answers to the complex problems confronting us. Even so, such an approach requires a superficial reading of the Scriptures and takes us down dangerous paths. Let’s think instead in terms of theological (and political) anchor points that these books provide for us:

  1. Revelation’s critique of empire: when power seeks worship

The Revelation of Saint John is not primarily a timetable for future events but an unveiling—an apocalypse— that exposes the spiritual seduction of empire. At the heart of Revelation’s warning is the moment when political power begins to demand the kind of devotion that belongs only to God. ‘The Beast’ is a ruler who receives worship:

“They worshipped the dragon… and they worshipped the beast” (Revelation 13:4).

This is not just political allegiance but adoration. John goes further:

The Beast “opened its mouth to utter blasphemies against God” (Revelation 13:6).

In biblical language, blasphemy is not just insulting God; it is also claiming divine prerogatives and accepting honours that belong to God alone.

Revelation’s imagery is deliberately exaggerated and symbolic because it is meant to help the church recognise a recurring pattern. Empires become beastly when they demand loyalty, devotion, or awe that belongs only to the Lamb. And Revelation’s answer is always the same:

“Worthy is the Lamb who was slain” (Revelation 5:12).

The Lamb—not any earthly ruler—is the world’s true and only saviour!

  1. The “man of lawlessness”: when a human takes God’s place

Saint Paul gives the church another lens for discernment. In 2 Thessalonians, he describes a figure who does not merely receive worship but actively claims divine status:

He “exalts himself over everything that is called God” and “proclaims himself to be God” (2 Thess 2:4).

This is the clearest biblical example of a human leader pretending to be God. Paul’s concern is pastoral rather than prophetic. Even so, he warns the church that spiritual deception can come through:

  • charismatic leaders,
  • political movements,
  • systems that elevate human authority to divine heights.

The danger Paul sees is not that Christians will misidentify the Antichrist but rather that they will misplace their hope. His antidote is simple: hold fast to Christ, and do not let any earthly power take Christ’s place.

  1. The counterfeit trinity: when propaganda becomes worship

Revelation deepens the warning by showing not just a leader, but a system that imitates the things of God. John describes a second beast — later called the “false prophet” — who performs signs and directs people’s devotion toward the first beast:

It “deceives those who dwell on the earth” (Revelation 13:14).

This is a parody of the Holy Spirit, who glorifies Christ. The dragon, the beast, and the false prophet form a counterfeit trinity — a political‑religious machine that mimics divine authority.

The point here is not to identify particular players. The key is recognising the pattern. When political power is supported by a religious aura, a myth of destiny or a cult of personality, the church must stand up!

  1. We must be cautious about political-messianic imagery

Throughout history, empires have used religious imagery to sanctify their political authority:

  • Roman emperors were called “divi filius”—”son of god.”
  • Mediaeval kings were anointed with chrism.
  • Modern regimes have used sacred symbols to inspire devotion.

Revelation unmasks this as a spiritual danger. It is not that every empire is evil but that every empire is tempted to claim more than it should. Whenever a leader is portrayed as a healer, saviour, redeemer, or chosen deliverer, the church must remember the following:

“Salvation belongs to our God… and to the Lamb” (Revelation 7:10).

Who is worthy of worship?

  • Not presidents.
  • Not emperors.
  • Not nations.
  • Not movements.

Only the Lamb is worthy!

So … I’ve deliberately laid out the biblical principles above without aligning them directly with any current political figures. You can do that for yourself. Are there any leaders out there who are blaspheming, claiming divine prerogatives or leading the faithful astray? Do the maths. Come to your own conclusions.

In truth, I don’t think we really need you to identify ‘the Beast’. What is far more essential is to recognise when our imaginations are being shaped by something other than the gospel. Whenever any earthly power starts to look like a saviour, God’s people must remember that only the Lamb is worthy of worship.

  • Revelation calls us to discernment.
  • Paul calls us to steadfastness.
  • Jesus calls us to worship God alone.

Amen!

Posted in Social Comment | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Six Non‑Negotiable Terms to End the U.S. War on Iran

Posted on April 11, 2026 by Father Dave

You’ll find below a press release, followed by a universal appeal to thinkers,  scholars, institutions of conscience, and the advocates for justice across the world to bring an end oto the violent insanity being meted out by the current US administration on Iran and on Lebanon. 

it was my privilege to be asked to add my signature to this “Declaration to the Conscience of Humanity” (no. 79). I look down the list of signatories and see so many estemed friends and global thought leaders. Surely, the the hubris of Mr Trump and his cronies must eventually collapse under the weight of the public outrcy against them? 

“Six Non‑Negotiable Terms from international Scholars and Former Officials from 30 countries to End the U.S. War on Iran Amid Trump’s Threat of War Crimes”

The conscience of humanity resists “everything for us, nothing for others,” the creed of the predatory empire erected on the corpses of nations. The shameless rapacity and insolence have reached their zenith, and Trump’s threats illustrate the depraved spirit of a decaying civilisation. We must not be passive witnesses, but active architects of a new world where arrogance crumbles and righteousness prevails.

A large transnational group of prominent voices—including former UN officials, Retired career diplomats, former ministers, scholars and intellectuals, political figures and former parliamentarians, military and security professionals, artists, lawyers as well as journalists, activists, and antiwar leaders, from 30 countries—has released an open letter sharply criticising the global role of the United States and calling for a new international order centered on sovereignty and resistance to what they describe as Western domination.

Most of the signatories are from Western countries, alongside participants from Asia, Latin America, and Africa. The declaration, titled “A Declaration to the Conscience of Humanity,” was signed by over 170 signatories from countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, Portugal, Belgium, Italy, Scotland, Ireland, Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Serbia, Poland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Lithuania, Russia, China, Malaysia, India, Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Mexico, South Africa, Lebanon, Turkey, and Iran.

In this fact-based public letter, the authors deliver a sweeping critique of American foreign policy and historical conduct. The letter states that for “249 years—spanning the entirety of its existence since 1776—the United States built a record of atrocity that belonged to a darker, pre-civilised age,” describing the country as “a predatory empire erected on the corpses of nations.”

The signatories, including current and former professors affiliated with 52 universities and academic institutions worldwide, accuse Washington of maintaining global military dominance through an extensive overseas presence. They state that the United States operates “over 800 military garrisons poisoning more than 90 foreign countries and territories” and has cultivated what the signatories call “a doctrine of absolute predation.”

The declaration also condemns U.S. involvement in major wars of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, referring to what it calls “the genocidal horror of Vietnam,” “the annihilation of Cambodia,” and the “systematic slaughter of Koreans,” as well as the destruction of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan.

A central focus of the document is the ongoing confrontation involving Iran. These public figures argue that the current situation reflects what they describe as an expansionist U.S. strategy aimed at dominating global resources. According to the statement, the United States government is driven by “the demonic creed of ‘everything for us, nothing for others’,” which they say seeks control of global resources ranging from “the oil of Venezuela” to “the mineral wealth of Greenland” or “the energy reserves of Canada”.

The undersigned further assert that U.S. policy now “fixates on Iran” because the country possesses “over seven percent of the world’s mineral and energy wealth,” which they describe as “the final frontier of plunder.”

The document also criticizes contemporary American leadership, arguing that the “moral collapse of the West finds its embodiment in the pathetic figure of Mr. Trump,” and calling for what they describe as an end to “the era of pillage.”

Beyond its criticism of U.S. policy, the announcement proposes several demands that the signatories say are necessary to end the current war on Iran. These include guarantees against future aggression, the dismantling of U.S. military installations in the region, formal international condemnation of acts of aggression, reparations for damages caused by war, the establishment of a new legal framework for the Strait of Hormuz, recognising Iran’s sovereignty, and the prosecution and extradition of operatives in anti-Iranian media who have incited this bloodshed.

The authors also call on intellectuals, scholars, institutions, and civil society organizations worldwide to condemn what is described as the normalization of violations of international law and to challenge the global

structures that sustain domination and military intervention.

In conclusion, the signatories argue that the present moment represents a decisive historical turning point. “We stand with justice—not as passive witnesses, but as active architects of a new world,” the letter states, emphasizing that the international community must confront what it calls the return of predatory power in global politics.

Among the signatories are prominent scientists and figures representing a wide array of expertise and leadership, including philosophers, economists, historians, sociologists, jurists, theologians, Islamologists, reverends, biologists, physicians, musicians, filmmakers, songwriters, singers, entrepreneurs, engineers, novelists, theorists, as well as a physicist, a psychologist, an anthropologist, and a comedian. This diverse coalition reflects the global conscience of humanity, uniting professionals, scholars, and advocates from multiple disciplines in a shared call against U.S. exceptionalism.

The full text of the declaration, along with the complete list of signatories, has been released publicly in more than ten languages:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

A Declaration to the Conscience of Humanity

 To the peoples of the world, to thinkers, to scholars, and to those who believe in justice:

A specter now haunts the conscience of humanity—the return of predatory power— and it shall no longer go unchallenged.

For 249 years—spanning the entirety of its existence since 1776—the United States built a record of atrocity that belonged to a darker, pre-civilised age; the predatory empire erected on the corpses of nations; from the genocide of nearly 5 million Indigenous peoples, to the brutal enslavement of over 4 million Africans, to the lynching of more than 4,000 Black citizens under Jim Crow. With over 800 military garrisons poisoning more than 90 foreign countries and territories, it cultivated a doctrine of absolute predation. From the genocidal horror of Vietnam, with over 3 million dead; to the annihilation of Cambodia, where 2 million perished under US-backed terror; to the systematic slaughter of Koreans, with more than 4 million Korean lives extinguished; to the destruction of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan, where one million Iraqis and tens of thousands of Libyans were consumed by US fire.

Yet the rational order that governs the world once helped humanity move beyond such practices. Humanity had consigned this barbarism to history. But now we are witnessing its return. The ongoing, systematic immolation of Gaza through the sustained support for the genocidal Israeli regime, where over 77,000 civilians in Palestine have been butchered—the scale of this atrocity reveals an inescapable truth: the pre-civilised practice has returned, and Washington has once again become its willing executor.

This is the demonic creed of “everything for us, nothing for others.” With shameless rapacity, it claims the resources of the world—whether the oil of Venezuela, the mineral wealth of Greenland, or the energy reserves of Canada—as objects of strategic entitlement. And now, that gluttonous eye fixates on Iran. Because Iran—possessing over 7% of the world’s mineral and energy wealth—is seen as the final frontier of plunder.

Yet this is no longer a matter of economics. It is a matter of honour. The world witnesses that the United States is actively engaged in a criminal enterprise termed the “Ramadan War” against the Iranian nation. This ongoing butchery has already claimed the lives of 208 innocent children. Let the world mark the date—168 of them were little girls, elementary students at the Shadjareh Tayyebeh School in Minab city in Iran, extinguished in their classrooms by US ordained terror.

Their futile and desperate contrivances aim at so-called “regime change” and the fragmentation of Iran—stripping the nation of its sovereignty and, thereby, facilitating the systematic plunder of its resources. In pursuit of this ultimate depravity, the U.S. brutally assassinated Iran’s spiritual and intellectual leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei—recognised globally as a voice against arrogance and terrorism—along with his family.

They have waged a war of targeted terror against the very pillars of the Iranian state. To date, US aggression has criminally murdered 39 Iranian statesmen, including the scientific genius Dr. Ali Larijani, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

Now, the insolence has reached its zenith. The US President openly threatens the Iranian people on social media with the destruction of their energy infrastructure. This is the depraved spirit of a decaying civilisation. The moral collapse of the West finds its embodiment in the pathetic figure of Mr. Trump—a man whose catastrophic conduct over the last two years has exhausted not only the world, but his own people. The time has come to declare, with one voice: Enough! The era of pillage is over.

But the United States has made a fatal miscalculation. What stands before it is not merely a nation, but a civilisation that has weaponised its own DNA—ancient organisational genius fused with 21st-century scientific sovereignty. This is the reality of active deterrence by Iran; a global pole of power that dictates the terms of engagement, forcing strategic retreat by rewriting the very rules of active defence. Now, its adaptive reorganisation, civilisational continuity, and social unity have fused into a singular, unbreakable force.

Iran’s all-encompassing defence and active deterrence represents a golden opportunity to end global hegemony. The historical and civilisational doctrine of Iran is absolute: power does not confer right, and domination cannot serve as a foundation for justice. This is recognised as the bedrock of Iran’s invincibility. The world may avail itself of this historic turning point, drawing upon this very doctrine of liberation, to bring an end to domination and oppression wherever they may exist.

US and Israeli exceptionalism have dragged the world into an epoch defining choice between might and right, sovereignty and subjugation, dignity and dishonour. This moment must serve as the wake-up call for humanity to recognize that there is another way. It must impel people everywhere to do everything in their power to challenge the structures undergirding a global system that desecrates every moral value including the right to life itself.

Iran is the final frontier. If it falls, the hope of a better, enlightened future for the world dies with it. We cannot let that happen. The aggression against Iran is part of a system of global power that oppresses all of us. We cannot afford to stand by and watch arrogant authoritarianism running amok. Our very future depends on the success of Iran.

Therefore we cannot countenance any outcome of this war that involves a return to the status quo ante. Those who inflict such suffering must be made to pay a hefty price for their crimes. They must be made to realise that military might does not absolve them of the responsibility to uphold the laws on which the peace and security of our world depend. To that end, we support the terms set out by Iran for ending this war.

From the perspective of global justice, the terms for ending this war are absolute and non-negotiable:

  1. Guarantees against repetition and a binding international commitment ensuring no future aggression.
  2. The immediate dismantling of all US military installations in the region.
  3. Formal admission of aggression, international condemnation of the aggressors, and full reparations for life and property.
  4. An immediate end to war on all regional fronts.
  5. A new legal regime for the Strait of Hormuz, recognising Iran’s sovereignty.
  6. The prosecution and extradition of operatives in anti-Iranian media who have incited this bloodshed.

We, the undersigned in spirit, call upon our peers, the thinkers, the scholars, the institutions of conscience, and the advocates of justice across the world:

  • Condemn the United States unequivocally for its systematic normalisation of contempt for international covenants and its reversion to the spirit of historical savagery and barbarism.
  • Isolate the rogue regime of the United States diplomatically and economically for its ongoing crimes against humanity.
  • Recognise Iran’s inherent right to active deterrence against unprovoked aggression.
  • Demand the immediate cessation of American and U.S.-sponsored terrorism and the prosecution of those who order it.

As it has always done, history will record the courage of those who refuse to remain silent. We stand with justice—not as passive witnesses, but as active architects of a new world that has reached its threshold where arrogance crumbles and righteousness prevails. The arrogant must be dismantled. The world demands it. Justice will enforce it.

Signed in solidarity;

  1. Richard Falk (USA)

Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University and former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (2008 – 2014) author or editor of more than 50 books on international law and global politics

  1. Denis Halliday (Ireland)

Former UN Secretary-General deputy and Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq, Gandhi International Peace Award (2003)

  1. Norman Finkelstein (USA)

Highly internationally known political scientist, son of Holocaust-survivor parents, widely cited & recognized in Middle East political debate. former Professor at universities of DePaul, Princeton, Rutgers and New York

  1. Avi Shlaim (UK)

Professor Emeritus of International Relations and Historian at St Antony’s College, Oxford University, British Academy Medal (2017) for lifetime achievement, PEN Hessell‑Tiltman Prize (2024) for historical writing

  1. Hans von Sponeck (Germany)

Former UN Assistant Secretary-General and UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq

  1. Alain de Benoist (France)

Internationally recognized philosopher and essayist whose work spans political theory, philosophy, history of religions, and cultural criticism, focused on critiques of liberalism, universalism, and modern egalitarian ideolog

  1. Chris Williamson (UK)

Former Shadow Minister for Communities and Local Government (2010 to 2013), Former member of Parliament for 7 years, former leader of Derby City Counci

  1. Boaventura de Sousa Santos (Portugal)

One of the world’s most internationally highly cited sociologists, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the School of Economics of the University of Coimbra, Distinguished Legal Scholar at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School, Founder of the World Social Forum & the concept of “Epistemologies of the South”, Frantz Fanon Lifetime Achievement Award (2022), Kalven Prize, Jabuti Award, Gulbenkian Science Prize

  1. Jean Bricmont (Belgium)

Internationally cited theoretical physicist and philosopher of science, Professor at the Catholic University of Louvain, author/co-author of several books including Fashionable Nonsense and Humanitarian Imperialism

  1. Dieudonné (France)

Internationally recognized Artist and Stand-up Comedian, author of more than 25 one-man shows, recipient of the Grand Prix de l’Humour Noir (2000) for his contribution to satirical comedy

  1. Hamid Algar (USA)

Professor Emeritus of Persian studies at the University of California, Berkeley, King Faisal Prize laureate

  1. Oya Baydar (Turkey)

Iconic Novelist and Sociologist who spent years in political exile after the 1980 Turkish coup d’état, later she returned and continued her literary career. She holds 5 Awards on novels, literature, short story and culture

  1. Philip Giraldi (USA)

Counterterrorism Expert and Columnist, Executive Director of the non-profit, non-partisan anti-war advocacy group The Council for the National Interest (CNI), Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

  1. Imam Suhaib Webb (UK)

Former imam of the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center, Former Resident Scholar of the Islamic Center of New York University, founder of Ella Collins Institute, one of the World’s 500 Most Influential Muslims list by the Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre (2010), recipient as Best Muslim Blog of the Year and Best Muslim Tweeter of the Year by Brass Crescent Awards

  1. Cynthia McKinney (USA)

Former Congresswomen for 6 terms (Georgia), Assistant Professor and Director of the Office of External Affairs at North South University; recipient of various peace and human-rights awards (e.g., peace advocacy awards)

  1. Ann Wright (USA)

Army Colonel and Former US diplomat who resigned in 2003 in opposition to the US war on Iraq, Jurist

  1. Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid (Malaysia)

President of Malaysia Consultative Council of Islamic Organizations

  1. Roshan Baig (India)

Former seven-time member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, Former Minister of Home Affairs, Former Minister for Urban Development, Former Minister for Infrastructure

  1. Saied Reza Ameli (Islamic Republic of Iran)

Full Professor of Communication and Global Studies at the University of Tehran, Head of the UNESCO Chair on Cyberspace and Culture, Founder and Dean of the Faculty of World Studies, Editor-in-chief of Journal of Cyberspace Studies, Member of Iranian Academy of Sciences as well as two High State Cultural Councils

  1. Haim Bresheeth (UK)

Retired Professorial Research Associate Professor of Film, Media and Cultural Studies, and Visual Culture at the School of SOAS, the University of East London, Campaign Against Misrepresentation in Public Affairs

  1. Mohammad Marandi (Islamic Republic of Iran)

Full Professor of English Literature, Orientalism and American Studies at University of Tehran

  1. Ajamu Baraka (USA)

2016 Green Party nominee for Vice President, Anti-Colonial fighter and Veteran of U.S. Black Liberation Movement, Founder of Black Alliance for Peace

  1. Bijan Abdolkarimi(Islamic Republic of Iran)

Philosopher, prominent intellectual in post October 7th era, focused on ontology and political philosophy, specializing in the thought of Martin Heidegger, Associate Professor of philosophy in Islamic Azad University

  1. Daud Abdullah (UK)

Director of Middle East Monitor and former Deputy Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain

  1. Vijay Prashad (India)

Director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, editor of LeftWord Books, Chief Correspondent at Globetrotter, and senior fellow at Renmin University of China, advisory board member of the US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, co-founder of the Forum of Indian Leftists, Muzaffar Ahmad Book Prize, Paul A. Baran–Paul M. Sweezy Memorial Award

  1. Ramón Grosfoguel (USA)

Sociologist and Professor Emeritus at the Department of Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley

  1. Lawrence Davidson (USA)

Professor Emeritus of Middle East History at West Chester University (WCU)

  1. David Miller (UK)

Sociologist and former professor at the University of Strathclyde, the University of Bath and the University of Bristol, Co-Director of Spinwatch

  1. Abbas Edalat (UK)

Professor of Computer Science and Mathematics at Imperial College London and founder of the Science and Arts Foundation (SAF) and Campaign against Sanctions, Military and Imperial Interventions (CASMII)

  1. Dinah Shelton (USA)

Professor Emeritus of International Law at George Washington University Law School; former Commissioner and President of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2010–2014), Elizabeth Haub Prize for Environmental Law (2006), International Environmental Law Award (2016

  1. Jodi Dean (USA)

Political Theorist and Professor at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, former Erasmus Professor of the Humanities in the Faculty of Philosophy at Erasmus University Rotterdam

  1. Peter Limb (USA)

Internationally recognized Historian and Professor at Michigan State University

  1. Michael Maloof (USA)

Former Senior Security Policy Analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense

  1. Michael Springmann (USA)

Former Diplomat in Germany and Saudi Arabia, Attorney and Counsellor at Law, Doctor of Law

  1. Augusto Sinagra (Italy)
    Professor Emeritus of International Law at Sapienza University of Rome
  1. Syed Sadatullah Husaini (India)

President of India’s biggest Muslim origination (Jamaat-e-Islami Hind)

  1. Angelo d’Orsi (Italy)

Historian of Philosophy and Professor Emeritus of History of Political Doctrines at the University of Turin

  1. Sibel Edmonds (USA)

Exposer of corruption and intelligence failures within U.S. government agencies, PEN/Newman’s Own First Amendment Award (2006), Sam Adams Award for Integrity in Intelligence (2012)

  1. Kevin B. MacDonald (USA)

Professor Emeritus of Evolutionary Psychology at California State University, Long Beach (CSULB)

  1. Alberto Bradanini (Italy)

Former director of UN Interregional Crime & Justice Research Institute & UN Research Institute on Crime & Drugs, former ambassador in Tehran and Beijing, president of the Centre for Contemporary China Studies in Italy

  1. James H. Fetzer (USA)

McKnight Professor Emeritus of the Philosophy of Science at the University of Minnesota Duluth

  1. Piero Bevilacqua (Italy)

Historian, Professor of Contemporary History at the Sapienza University of Rome, author of 34 books

  1. Claudio Mutti (Italy)

Former Professor at the University of Bologna, Director of “Eurasia, Rivista di Studi Geopolitici”

  1. Siddiqullah Chowdhury (India)

Representative of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, member of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC)

  1. Claudio Moffa (Italy)

Former Professor of History of International Relations at the University of Teramo

  1. Maria Poumier (France)

Professor at University of Havana, Former Professor at the University of Paris (Sorbonne), documentary maker

  1. Bruno Drweski (France)

Professor Emeritus at the National Institute of Oriental Languages ​​and Civilizations (Université Paris-Cité) and Paris Geopolitics Academy

  1. Paulina Aroch Fugellie (Mexico)

Full Professor at the Department of Humanities, Metropolitan Autonomous University

  1. Munyaradzi Mushonga (South Africa)

Global Academic Director for the Decolonial International Network (DIN), Associate Professor at the University of the Free State

  1. Mufti Mukarram Ahmed (India)

Religious and literary scholar, Imam of India’s second largest mosque (Shahi Masjid Fatehpuri)

  1. Alain Corvez (France)

Colonel of French Army, former advisor minister of defense, former deputy to the General Commanding the UN Force in South Lebanon, advisor in international affairs

  1. Jodie Evans (USA)

Co-founder of the anti-war organization Code Pink, Filmmaker, former board chair of Rainforest Action Network

  1. Jean-Louis Poirier (France)

Philosopher, Historian and Translator

  1. Zlatko Hadžidedić (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Political Scientist and Director of the Center for Nationalism Studies in Sarajevo

  1. Elizabeth Murray (USA)

Former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for the Near East at the National Intelligence Council; member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

  1. Pepe Escobar (Brazil)

Geopolitical Analyst and Journalist who has written for Asia Times, Mondialisation.ca, CounterPunch, Al-Jazeera, RT, Sputnik, Strategic Culture Foundation and Guancha

  1. Rodney Shakespeare (UK)

Economist and Visiting Professor at Trisakti University, Expert on Binary Economic

  1. Salman Hussaini Nadwi (India)

Founding member/chairman of numerous religious, medical, IT and engineering colleges and hospitals, scholar and professor in the Islamic sciences, author of numerous scholarly works, President of Jamiat Shabaab ul Islam, editor and co-editor of thirteen different periodicals in English, Urdu, Persian and Arabic languages

  1. Ralph Bosshard (Switzerland)

Former Military Advisor to the Secretary General of Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

  1. Daniel Estulin (Lithuania)

Writer and international speaker, author of “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group”

  1. Peter Koenig (Switzerland)

Economist and Geopolitical Analyst with more than 30 years of experience in the World Bank, the World Health Organization and the Swiss Development Cooperation

  1. İbrahim Betil (Turkey)

Founding President of the Turkish Education Volunteers Foundation, Businessman and Social Entrepreneur, former CEO of Tekfen Holding, Multiple Turkish civil society and philanthropy awards

  1. Tommy Sheridan (Scotland)

Candidate for Glasgow in 2026 Scottish Parliamentary Elections, Former Member of the Parliament, Former Convenor of Scottish Socialist Party, Former Glasgow City Councillor, former Convenor of Solidarity

  1. Christoph Hörstel (Germany)

Author and Expert on Security, NATO Policies, Geopolitics, and German foreign policy, Publicist

  1. Sara Flounders (USA)

Co-director of the International Action Center and Secretariat Member of the Workers World Party

  1. Kevin J. Barrett (USA)

Arabist-Islamologist Scholar, former Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

  1. Zakia Soman (India)

Former Professor of Business Communication at the University of Gujarat, Founder of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) on women’s rights, member of South Asian Alliance for Poverty Eradication (SAAPE)

  1. Stephen Sizer (UK)

Former Vicar of Christ Church of Virginia Water in Surrey and director of the Peacemaker Trust

  1. Michael Jones (USA)

Former Professor of English literature at Saint Mary’s College (Indiana), founder of Culture Wars Magazine

  1. Tim Anderson (Australia)

Political Economist, Director of Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, Former Senior lecturer at the University of Sydney 

  1. Piers Robinson (UK)

Former Professor of Political Journalism, International Politics and Political Communication at Universities of Sheffield, Manchester and Liverpool, Co-Director Organisation for Propaganda Studies & Research Director at
the International Center for 9/11 Justice

  1. Pino Cabras (Italy)

Former Vice-President of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Italian Parliament

  1. Jean Michel Vernochet (France)

Former Journalist of Le Figaro Magazine, Writer and Geopolitical Analyst

  1. Angelo Persiani (Italy)

Former Ambassador in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Sweden

  1. Guillermo Barreto (Venezuela)

Biologist and Retired Full Professor at the Organisms Biology Department of Simón Bolívar University

  1. Mateusz Piskorski (Poland)

Former Professor at University of Szczecin and Jan Długosz University, Co-founder of the European Center of Geopolitical Analysis, former member of the Polish Parliament in the Assembly of Western European Union

  1. Declan Hayes (Ireland)

Retired Professor at the Sophia University of Tokyo

  1. Anisur Rahman Qasmi (India)

Scholar, community leader, Former vice president of the All India Milli Council, lecturer on Islamic jurisprudence

  1. Dave Smith (Australia)

Anglican priest, Social Educator, Boxer, 2022 Candidate in Federal Election – United Australia Party (Grayndler)

  1. Aran Martin (Australia)

Managing Editor of the Institute of Postcolonial Studies (IPCS), Professor at University of Melbourne, Executive Director of Global Security Foundation, Editor of Postcolonial Studies

  1. David Rovics (USA)

Singer and Songwriter, Musician focused on US wars, globalization, anarchism, social justice and labor history, ASCAP Deems Taylor Award

  1. Vito Petrocelli (Italy)

Former Chairman of Foreign affairs committee of Italian Senate, Editorial Director of AntiDiplomatico,

  1. Dilek Bektas (Turkey)

Retired Professor at Mimar Sinan Fine Art University

  1. Veysel Dinler (Turkey)

Professor of law at Hitit University

  1. Christian Bouchet (France)

Anthropologist, Former Politician and Antiwar Activist

  1. Hacer Ansal (Turkey)

Professor of Sociology at Işık University, Expert on Social Theory and Gender

  1. Denijal Jegić (Lebanon)

Professor of communication in the Department of Communication at Lebanese American University

  1. Pawel Moscicki (Poland)

Professor at the Polish Academy of Sciences, Philosopher, Essayist, host of the Inny Swiat podcast

  1. Vanessa Beeley (France)

Photographer and Independent Journalist on Middle Eastern issues based in Syria

  1. Massoud Shadjareh (UK)

Chair of Islamic Human Rights Commission-London, holding consultative status at the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs

  1. Zeki Kılıçaslan (Turkey)

Professor of chest diseases at Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Social Justice Advocate

  1. Sandew Hira (Netherlands)

Founder of Decolonial International Network known for his Decolonial Theory, Director of International Institute for Scientific Research

  1. Paul Larudee (USA)

Founder of the Free Gaza Movement and the Free Palestine Movement, Member of the International Solidarity Movement, co-speaker of the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla

  1. Yvonne Ridley (UK)

Secretary General of European Muslim League, Candidate for Glasgow in 2026 Scottish Parliamentary Elections, Former President of the International Muslim Women’s Union

  1. Konrad Rekas (Poland–Scotland)

Lecturer at Nottingham Trent University, Member of Polish YES for Scotland

  1. James Perloff (USA)

Author, Researcher, and former Editor-In-Chief of The New American magazine

  1. Lucien Cerise (France)

Author of Governing by Chaos, Antiwar activist and Geopolitical Analyst

  1. Jürgen Cain Külbel (Germany)

Criminologist, Investigative Journalist, Author of a book on Israel’s role in assassination of Hariri

  1. Carol Brouillet (USA)

Peace activist, co-founder of the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance, and Green Party candidate for the U.S. Congress in California (2006, 2008, 2012)

  1. Dogan Bermek (Turkey)

President of Alevi Philosophy Center Association, Former President of the Alavi Federation of Turkiye

  1. Gilles Munier (France)

Investigative Journalist and Secretary General of the Franco-Iraqi Friendships Association

  1. Rebecca Shoot (USA)

International lawyer, Co-Convener of Washington Working Group for the International Criminal Court and Co-Convener ImPact Coalition on Strengthening International Judicial Institutions

  1. Leonid Savin (Russia)

Chief editor of Geopolitika.ru (from 2008), founder and chief editor of Journal of Eurasian Affairs

  1. Rich Siegel (USA)

Pianist, songwriter, writer and peace activist, and 2015 Green Party political candidate in New Jersey

  1. Gordon Duff (USA)

Former UN Diplomat in Iraq, Vietnam War Marine

  1. Marion Sigaut (France)

Historian, Essayist, and Researcher on French history and political thought

  1. Caleb Maupin (USA)

Founder of Center for Political Innovation, Journalist

  1. Jacob Cohen (France)

Academic, Novelist and Antiwar Activist

  1. Ken O’keefe (USA–Ireland)

Former Marine and Gulf War veteran, antiwar activist

  1. Rainer Rupp (Germany)

Economist and Journalist

  1. Thomas Werlet (France)

Leader of Mouvement FRANCE RÉSISTANCE 

  1. Dragana Trifković (Serbia)

Director General of the Center for Geostrategic Studies & President of the Eurasian Media Forum

  1. Feroze Mithiborwala (India)

Columnist and Founder of India Iran Friendship Forum

  1. Imam Muhammad al-Asi (USA)

Former Imam of the Islamic Center of Washington, Research Fellow at the Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought

  1. Benedetto Ligorio (Italy)

Assistant Professor at the Department of philosophy of Sapienza University of Rome

  1. Rania Masri (USA)
    Co-Director of North Carolina Environmental Justice Network
  1. Peter Sainsbury (Australia)

Adjunct Professor, University of Notre Dame Australia, School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia,

  1. Haydeé García Bravo (Mexico)

Associate Researcher at Center of Interdisciplinarity Research in Science and Humanities, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)

  1. José Gandarilla Salgado (Mexico)

Senior Researcher at Center of Interdisciplinarity Research in Science and Humanities, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)

  1. Finian Cunningham (Ireland)

Author and Journalist at Strategic Culture Foundation

  1. Margherita Furlan (Italy)

Journalist and director of Casa Del Sole TV

  1. Eva Bartlett (Canada–USA)

Independent journalist, war correspondent, and activist focusing on Middle East conflicts

  1. Teša Tešanović (Serbia)

Journalist and TV host, founder of Balkan Info

  1. Claude Janvier (France)

Writer, Essayist and Columnist

  1. Eric Walberg (Canada)

Geopolitical Expert and Author

  1. Valérie Bugault (France)

Jurist and geopolitical analyst; Jurist

  1. Adrián Salbuchi (Argentina)

Political Analyst and Writer

  1. Yvan Benedetti (France)

One of the prominent leaders of Yellow Vests Movement

  1. Yannick Sauveur (France)

Writer and Geopolitical analyst

  1. Pierre-Antoine Plaquevent (France)

Writer, political analyst, and international consultant, Head the Strategika think tank and the Polemos newsletter

  1. Arnaud Develay (France)

Political Consultant and International Legal Expert

  1. Michael Spath (USA)

Executive Director of Indiana Center for Middle East Peace

  1. Zhu Haozeng (China)

Editor in Chief of Haikou Xianjielun Cultural Media

  1. António Gomes Marques (Portugal)

Retired Banking Director, Essayist

  1. Haleh Niazmand (USA)

Professor of Art at Modesto Junior College, Conceptual Artist, Curator, and Art Critic

  1. Claude Timmerman (France)
    Biologist, statistician, and researcher in population genetics; Essayist, commentator of Boulevard Voltaire
  1. Hafsa Kara-Mustapha (UK)

Journalist and Author, Head of Global Operations African Legacy Foundation

  1. Ginette Hess Skandrani (France)

Antiwar activist and member of Parti des Verts (French Green party)

  1. Yacob Mahi (Belgium)

Theologian and Islamologist, Professor of Islamic Studies

  1. Adam Shamir (Sweden)

Writer, Journalist, and Political Commentator

  1. Jean-Loup Izambert (France)

Independent Investigative Journalist and Writer

  1. Zafar Bangash (Canada)

Director Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought in Toronto

  1. Imad Hamrouni (France)

Professor at Académie de Géopolitique de Paris, expert on Middle Eastern affairs

  1. Joe Iosbaker (USA)

Coordinator of the March on the Democratic National Convention 2024 to Stand With Palestine

  1. Richard Haley (UK)

Chair of Scotland Against Criminalising Communities

  1. David J. Reilly (USA)

Independent Journalist, Political Commentator, Former Candidate for Governor of Idaho in 2020

  1. Nasreen Methai (India)

Founding member of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA); an NGO working on women’s rights

  1. Kim Petersen (USA)

Co-editor of the Dissident Voice newsletter

  1. Stefano Bonilauri (Italy)

Journalist and Director of Anteo Edizioni

  1. Tobias Pfennig (Germany)

Software Engineer and political activist

  1. Tony Gosling (UK)

Investigative journalist and political activist

  1. Zhang Shouliang (China)
    Deputy editor-in-chief of Haikou Xianjielun Cultural Media
  1. Steven Sahiounie (USA)
    Award Winning Journalist and chief editor of MidEastDiscourse
  1. Ümit Aktaş (Turkey)

Physician, specialist in herbal therapy and acupuncture

  1. Imran Mohd Rasid (Malaysia)

Executive Director of Citizens International

  1. Aly Bakkali (Belgium)

President of Partie Islam, antiwar activist 

  1. Fatma Orgel (Turkey)

Physician at Esenler Clinic, antiwar activist 

  1. Gurhan Ertur (Turkey)

Director of the NGO Citizen Initiative, antiwar activist 

  1. Luca Arrighi (Italy)
    Logician and designer of deterministic governance architectures
  2. Dave Cannon (UK)

Chair of Jewish Network for Palestine

  1. Fatma Akdokur (Turkey)

Theology Instructor, antiwar activist 

  1. Houman Mortazavi (Canada)

Barrister and Solicitor, antiwar activist

  1. Q Massod (India)

Secretary of ASEEM, antiwar activist

  1. Richard Ray (USA)

Editor and Antiwar Activist 

  1. Shabbir Ali Warsi (India)

Scholar and Antiwar Activist

  1. Abbas Ali (UK)

InMinds Human Rights Group

  1. Norma Hashim (Malaysia)

Treasurer of Viva Palestina Malaysia

  1. Saidi Nordine (Belgium)

Co-spokesperson of Bruxelles Pantheres

  1. Iqbal Jassat (South Africa)

Executive Member of Media Review Network

  1. Syed Farid Nizami (India)

Scholar and Antiwar Activist 

  1. Asif Ali Zaidi (India)

Lawyer and Researcher, antiwar activist

  1. Kerem Ali (UK)

Spokesperson of Palestine Pulse

  1. Syed Mounis Abidi (India)

Human Rights Lawyer, antiwar activist

  1. Joe Lorincz (Australia)

Wentworth Falls NSW

  1. Mouhad Reghif (Belgium)

Co-spokesperson of Bruxelles Pantheres

 

 Signatories are signing in their individual capacities and affiliations are for identification purposes only.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment